NM_018136.5:c.7566A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_018136.5(ASPM):​c.7566A>G​(p.Leu2522Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.891 in 1,612,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 645,630 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L2522L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.81 ( 52044 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.90 ( 593586 hom. )

Consequence

ASPM
NM_018136.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.356
Variant links:
Genes affected
ASPM (HGNC:19048): (assembly factor for spindle microtubules) This gene is the human ortholog of the Drosophila melanogaster 'abnormal spindle' gene (asp), which is essential for normal mitotic spindle function in embryonic neuroblasts. Studies in mouse also suggest a role of this gene in mitotic spindle regulation, with a preferential role in regulating neurogenesis. Mutations in this gene are associated with microcephaly primary type 5. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, May 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 1-197101685-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-197101685-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 21602.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-197101685-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.356 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.976 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ASPMNM_018136.5 linkc.7566A>G p.Leu2522Leu synonymous_variant Exon 18 of 28 ENST00000367409.9 NP_060606.3 Q8IZT6-1B3KWI2
ASPMNM_001206846.2 linkc.4066-5521A>G intron_variant Intron 17 of 26 NP_001193775.1 Q8IZT6-2B3KWI2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ASPMENST00000367409.9 linkc.7566A>G p.Leu2522Leu synonymous_variant Exon 18 of 28 1 NM_018136.5 ENSP00000356379.4 Q8IZT6-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.812
AC:
123089
AN:
151598
Hom.:
52003
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.547
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.955
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.883
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.915
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.999
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.898
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.928
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.889
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.911
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.834
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.895
AC:
223759
AN:
249892
Hom.:
101432
AF XY:
0.900
AC XY:
121616
AN XY:
135128
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.543
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.939
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.907
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.899
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.930
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.906
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.904
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.899
AC:
1313541
AN:
1460310
Hom.:
593586
Cov.:
69
AF XY:
0.900
AC XY:
654203
AN XY:
726508
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.535
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.935
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.913
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.899
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.932
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.904
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.891
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.812
AC:
123184
AN:
151716
Hom.:
52044
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.815
AC XY:
60432
AN XY:
74166
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.547
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.884
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.915
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.999
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.899
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.928
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.911
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.836
Alfa
AF:
0.885
Hom.:
64783
Bravo
AF:
0.798
Asia WGS
AF:
0.929
AC:
3228
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.906
EpiControl
AF:
0.910

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 02, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 27, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Microcephaly 5, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:4Other:1
-
GeneReviews
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: literature only

- -

Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 28, 2017
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.89
CADD
Benign
0.52
DANN
Benign
0.55

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1412640; hg19: chr1-197070815; API