NM_020201.4:c.126G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP3_Moderate
The NM_020201.4(NT5M):c.126G>A(p.Met42Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000633 in 1,579,426 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M42V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020201.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_020201.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NT5M | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.126G>A | p.Met42Ile | missense | Exon 1 of 5 | ENSP00000373674.4 | Q9NPB1 | ||
| NT5M | TSL:1 | c.126G>A | p.Met42Ile | missense | Exon 1 of 5 | ENSP00000481269.1 | Q2I378 | ||
| NT5M | c.126G>A | p.Met42Ile | missense | Exon 1 of 6 | ENSP00000549663.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151802Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000960 AC: 2AN: 208252 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000560 AC: 8AN: 1427624Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000704 AC XY: 5AN XY: 710004 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 151802Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74128 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at