NM_020381.4:c.7T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_020381.4(PDSS2):c.7T>C(p.Phe3Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00605 in 1,613,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 329 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020381.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- coenzyme Q10 deficiency, primary, 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Leigh syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Leigh syndrome with nephrotic syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00880 AC: 1339AN: 152188Hom.: 46 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0155 AC: 3895AN: 250590 AF XY: 0.0144 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00576 AC: 8414AN: 1461672Hom.: 282 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00571 AC XY: 4152AN XY: 727134 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00884 AC: 1347AN: 152308Hom.: 47 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0103 AC XY: 768AN XY: 74482 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Kidney disorder Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at