NM_020845.3:c.*927C>A
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_020845.3(PITPNM2):c.*927C>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.541 in 152,482 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26,935 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.54 ( 26843 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.74 ( 92 hom. )
Consequence
PITPNM2
NM_020845.3 3_prime_UTR
NM_020845.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.17
Publications
15 publications found
Genes affected
PITPNM2 (HGNC:21044): (phosphatidylinositol transfer protein membrane associated 2) PITPNM2 belongs to a family of membrane-associated phosphatidylinositol transfer domain-containing proteins that share homology with the Drosophila retinal degeneration B (rdgB) protein (Ocaka et al., 2005 [PubMed 15627748]).[supplied by OMIM, Mar 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.702 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.541 AC: 82172AN: 152020Hom.: 26849 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
82172
AN:
152020
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.735 AC: 253AN: 344Hom.: 92 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.735 AC XY: 144AN XY: 196 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
253
AN:
344
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
144
AN XY:
196
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AC:
0
AN:
0
American (AMR)
AC:
0
AN:
0
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
2
East Asian (EAS)
AC:
0
AN:
0
South Asian (SAS)
AC:
0
AN:
0
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
247
AN:
332
Middle Eastern (MID)
AC:
0
AN:
0
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
8
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
2
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.522
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
9
12
15
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.540 AC: 82165AN: 152138Hom.: 26843 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.544 AC XY: 40456AN XY: 74376 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
82165
AN:
152138
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
40456
AN XY:
74376
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
6271
AN:
41516
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
9740
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
2148
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
3482
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
2781
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
7586
AN:
10566
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
167
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
48094
AN:
67986
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1215
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1490
2981
4471
5962
7452
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
686
1372
2058
2744
3430
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1958
AN:
3476
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.