NM_021117.5:c.845G>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_021117.5(CRY2):c.845G>T(p.Arg282Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R282H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_021117.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_021117.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRY2 | NM_021117.5 | MANE Select | c.845G>T | p.Arg282Leu | missense | Exon 6 of 12 | NP_066940.3 | A2I2P1 | |
| CRY2 | NM_001127457.3 | c.662G>T | p.Arg221Leu | missense | Exon 6 of 12 | NP_001120929.1 | Q49AN0-2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRY2 | ENST00000616080.2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.845G>T | p.Arg282Leu | missense | Exon 6 of 12 | ENSP00000484684.1 | Q49AN0-1 | |
| CRY2 | ENST00000443527.6 | TSL:1 | c.908G>T | p.Arg303Leu | missense | Exon 6 of 12 | ENSP00000406751.2 | A0A0D2X7Z3 | |
| CRY2 | ENST00000616623.4 | TSL:1 | c.908G>T | p.Arg303Leu | missense | Exon 6 of 12 | ENSP00000478187.1 | A0A0D2X7Z3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at