NM_022124.6:c.6687C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_022124.6(CDH23):c.6687C>T(p.Asp2229Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00087 in 1,599,276 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022124.6 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Usher syndrome type 1DInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Usher syndrome type 1Inheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_022124.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00463 AC: 704AN: 152138Hom.: 4 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00136 AC: 322AN: 236346 AF XY: 0.00121 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000475 AC: 687AN: 1447020Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000422 AC XY: 303AN XY: 717806 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00463 AC: 705AN: 152256Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00427 AC XY: 318AN XY: 74444 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at