NM_022356.4:c.693G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_022356.4(P3H1):​c.693G>A​(p.Ala231Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000564 in 1,614,182 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A231A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00060 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

P3H1
NM_022356.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.26

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
P3H1 (HGNC:19316): (prolyl 3-hydroxylase 1) This gene encodes an enzyme that is a member of the collagen prolyl hydroxylase family. These enzymes are localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and their activity is required for proper collagen synthesis and assembly. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta type VIII. Three alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. Other variants may exist, but their biological validity has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]
P3H1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 8
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • osteogenesis imperfecta type 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 1-42759316-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-42759316-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 468988.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.26 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
P3H1NM_022356.4 linkc.693G>A p.Ala231Ala synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 15 ENST00000296388.10 NP_071751.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
P3H1ENST00000296388.10 linkc.693G>A p.Ala231Ala synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 15 1 NM_022356.4 ENSP00000296388.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152176
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000412
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000215
AC:
54
AN:
251464
AF XY:
0.000221
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000598
AC:
874
AN:
1461888
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000601
AC XY:
437
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000329
AC:
11
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000447
AC:
2
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000936
AC:
5
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000754
AC:
838
AN:
1112006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000298
AC:
18
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.469
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
47
93
140
186
233
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
40
80
120
160
200
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000236
AC:
36
AN:
152294
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000201
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000120
AC:
5
AN:
41570
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000196
AC:
3
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000412
AC:
28
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.517
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000474
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000261
EpiCase
AF:
0.000382
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Recessive Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.

not specified Benign:1
Jan 18, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Osteogenesis imperfecta type 8 Benign:1
Jan 20, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
2.8
DANN
Benign
0.87
PhyloP100
-4.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149113630; hg19: chr1-43224987; API