NM_024407.5:c.68C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_024407.5(NDUFS7):c.68C>T(p.Pro23Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.592 in 1,610,648 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 287,790 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024407.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Leigh syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
- Leigh syndrome with leukodystrophyInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- mitochondrial complex I deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDUFS7 | NM_024407.5 | c.68C>T | p.Pro23Leu | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 8 | ENST00000233627.14 | NP_077718.3 | |
| NDUFS7 | NM_001363602.2 | c.68C>T | p.Pro23Leu | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 8 | NP_001350531.1 | ||
| NDUFS7 | XM_017026768.3 | c.68C>T | p.Pro23Leu | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 4 | XP_016882257.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.522 AC: 79346AN: 151926Hom.: 21646 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.546 AC: 134740AN: 246744 AF XY: 0.556 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.600 AC: 874836AN: 1458606Hom.: 266143 Cov.: 58 AF XY: 0.601 AC XY: 435964AN XY: 725652 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.522 AC: 79373AN: 152042Hom.: 21647 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.513 AC XY: 38160AN XY: 74316 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
- -
Leigh syndrome Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 3 Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at