NM_024509.2:c.178C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_024509.2(LRFN3):c.178C>T(p.Arg60Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000311 in 1,608,840 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R60Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024509.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_024509.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRFN3 | NM_024509.2 | MANE Select | c.178C>T | p.Arg60Trp | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | NP_078785.1 | Q9BTN0 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRFN3 | ENST00000246529.4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.178C>T | p.Arg60Trp | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000246529.3 | Q9BTN0 | |
| LRFN3 | ENST00000588831.5 | TSL:5 | c.178C>T | p.Arg60Trp | missense | Exon 3 of 4 | ENSP00000466989.1 | Q9BTN0 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000275 AC: 4AN: 1456610Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000414 AC XY: 3AN XY: 724776 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74366 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at