NM_024577.4:c.2087A>G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_024577.4(SH3TC2):c.2087A>G(p.His696Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000989 in 1,614,214 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0049 ( 6 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00058 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

SH3TC2
NM_024577.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.210

Publications

7 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SH3TC2 (HGNC:29427): (SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeats 2) This gene encodes a protein with two N-terminal Src homology 3 (SH3) domains and 10 tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) motifs, and is a member of a small gene family. The gene product has been proposed to be an adapter or docking molecule. Mutations in this gene result in autosomal recessive Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4C, a childhood-onset neurodegenerative disease characterized by demyelination of motor and sensory neurons. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

SH3TC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal recessive hereditary demyelinating motor and sensory neuropathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4C
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
susceptibility to mononeuropathy of the median nerve, mild
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

SH3TC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0026678145).

BP6

Variant 5-149027645-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-149027645-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 193931.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00488 (743/152326) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0163 (678/41580). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0153. There are 6 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 377 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SH3TC2	NM_024577.4 link	c.2087A>G	p.His696Arg	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 17	ENST00000515425.6	NP_078853.2	Q8TF17-1A0A514TP98

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SH3TC2	ENST00000515425.6 link	c.2087A>G	p.His696Arg	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 17	1	NM_024577.4	ENSP00000423660.1		Q8TF17-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00487

AC:

742

AN:

152208

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0163

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00334

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00334

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00151

AC:

379

AN:

251478

AF XY:

0.00133

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0171

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00205

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000211

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000978

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000583

AC:

853

AN:

1461888

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000540

AC XY:

393

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0166

AC:

557

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00203

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00260

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000764

AC:

AN:

1112008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00174

AC:

105

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

131

197

262

328

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00488

AC:

743

AN:

152326

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00506

AC XY:

377

AN XY:

74498

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0163

AC:

678

AN:

41580

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00333

AC:

AN:

15310

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5178

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000882

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00331

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.503

Heterozygous variant carriers

119

159

199

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00208

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00593

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0168

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00175

AC:

212

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000273

EpiControl

AF:

0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Dec 05, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 14, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Jun 28, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2021

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Benign:1

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4C

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4C;C3150596:Susceptibility to mononeuropathy of the median nerve, mild

Benign:1

Aug 16, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4

Benign:1

Jan 08, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Susceptibility to mononeuropathy of the median nerve, mild

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.053

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.64

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.68

CADD

Benign

2.3

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.41

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.053

T;.

Eigen

Benign

-1.3

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.2

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.031

LIST_S2

Benign

0.55

T;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0027

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

-1.9

N;.

PhyloP100

0.21

PrimateAI

Benign

0.21

PROVEAN

Benign

0.050

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.097

Sift

Benign

0.37

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.35

T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;.

Vest4

0.070

MVP

0.40

MPC

0.045

ClinPred

0.0096

GERP RS

2.7

Varity_R

0.033

gMVP

0.20

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over