NM_024813.3:c.865G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_024813.3(RPAP2):c.865G>A(p.Glu289Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000878 in 1,614,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024813.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- glomuvenous malformationInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_024813.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPAP2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.865G>A | p.Glu289Lys | missense | Exon 8 of 13 | ENSP00000476948.1 | Q8IXW5-1 | ||
| RPAP2 | c.865G>A | p.Glu289Lys | missense | Exon 8 of 14 | ENSP00000627772.1 | ||||
| RPAP2 | c.865G>A | p.Glu289Lys | missense | Exon 8 of 14 | ENSP00000627770.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000585 AC: 89AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000531 AC: 133AN: 250548 AF XY: 0.000517 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000909 AC: 1328AN: 1461696Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000840 AC XY: 611AN XY: 727152 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000584 AC: 89AN: 152330Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000510 AC XY: 38AN XY: 74496 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at