NM_025114.4:c.3790C>T

Variant names:

• chr12-88089271-G-A
• rs139998038
• NM_025114.4:c.3790C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2 BP4_Strong BP6

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):​c.3790C>T​(p.Arg1264Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000338 in 1,613,868 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 (1 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: CEP290 NM_025114.4 missense
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8 B:7
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 6.41

Genes affected

CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010934532).
• BP6: Variant 12-88089271-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88089271-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 310606.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=8}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP290	NM_025114.4	c.3790C>T	p.Arg1264Cys	missense_variant	Exon 31 of 54	ENST00000552810.6	NP_079390.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CEP290	ENST00000552810.6	c.3790C>T	p.Arg1264Cys	missense_variant	Exon 31 of 54	1	NM_025114.4	ENSP00000448012.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00172 AC: 261 AN: 152080 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00592

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000917

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000478 AC: 119 AN: 249174 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000377 AC XY: 51 AN XY: 135198

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00614

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000551

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000443

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000194 AC: 283 AN: 1461670 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000153 AC XY: 111 AN XY: 727110

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00642

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000671

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.000151

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00000899

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000331

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00172 AC: 262 AN: 152198 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00168 AC XY: 125 AN XY: 74412

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00592

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000916

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.000322 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00205

ESP6500AA AF: 0.00374 AC: 14

ESP6500EA AF: 0.000122 AC: 1

ExAC AF: 0.000538 AC: 65

Asia WGS AF: 0.000577 AC: 2 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:8 Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2

Jan 30, 2024

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BS1 -

Jul 18, 2024

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Retinal dystrophy Uncertain:2

Oct 01, 2023

Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

May 08, 2017

Blueprint Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Uncertain:1 Benign:1

May 18, 2018

Baylor Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Leber congenital amaurosis 10 Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel syndrome, type 4 Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1

Jun 01, 2021

DBGen Ocular Genomics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Oct 15, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Senior-Loken syndrome 6 Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

CEP290-related disorder Benign:1

Jul 18, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Leber congenital amaurosis Benign:1

Apr 17, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joubert syndrome 5 Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.14
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.071	T
BayesDel_noAF	Uncertain	0.13
CADD	Pathogenic	33
DANN	Pathogenic	1.0
DEOGEN2	Uncertain	0.70	.;.;D
Eigen	Pathogenic	0.75
Eigen_PC	Pathogenic	0.74
FATHMM_MKL	Pathogenic	0.98	D
LIST_S2	Pathogenic	0.98	D;D;D
M_CAP	Benign	0.081	D
MetaRNN	Benign	0.011	T;T;T
MetaSVM	Uncertain	-0.17	T
MutationAssessor	Uncertain	2.4	.;.;M
PrimateAI	Uncertain	0.66	T
PROVEAN	Uncertain	-4.3	D;D;D
REVEL	Uncertain	0.41
Sift	Pathogenic	0.0	D;D;D
Sift4G	Pathogenic	0.0010	D;D;D
Polyphen		1.0	.;.;D
Vest4		0.61
MVP		0.87
MPC		0.39
ClinPred		0.051	T
GERP RS		5.5
Varity_R		0.64
gMVP		0.37

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139998038; hg19: chr12-88483048;