NM_025114.4:c.384T>C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):c.384T>C(p.Asp128Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000199 in 1,613,236 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CEP290
NM_025114.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.209

Publications

5 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CEP290 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

CEP290-related ciliopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Joubert syndrome 5
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Leber congenital amaurosis 10
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Leber congenital amaurosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defect
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Meckel syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Senior-Loken syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CEP290 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).

BP6

Variant 12-88136700-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88136700-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 461782.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.209 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP290	NM_025114.4 link	c.384T>C	p.Asp128Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 54	ENST00000552810.6	NP_079390.3	O15078Q05BJ6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CEP290	ENST00000552810.6 link	c.384T>C	p.Asp128Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 54	1	NM_025114.4	ENSP00000448012.1		O15078

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000257

AC:

AN:

152018

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00675

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000831

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000502

AC:

125

AN:

249064

AF XY:

0.000511

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00617

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000165

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000193

AC:

282

AN:

1461100

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000205

AC XY:

149

AN XY:

726848

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44712

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000766

AC:

AN:

26122

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00565

AC:

224

AN:

39660

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000394

AC:

AN:

86236

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53388

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000360

AC:

AN:

1111402

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000298

AC:

AN:

60348

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.463

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000256

AC:

AN:

152136

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000282

AC XY:

AN XY:

74372

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41524

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15272

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00676

AC:

AN:

5176

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000832

AC:

AN:

4810

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10598

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

67974

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.501

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000611

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000310

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00289

AC:

AN:

3474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Senior-Loken syndrome 6

Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Leber congenital amaurosis 10

Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14

Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Meckel syndrome, type 4

Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Joubert syndrome 5

Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified

Benign:1

Aug 25, 2017

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome;C0687120:Nephronophthisis

Benign:1

Dec 16, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Retinal dystrophy

Benign:1

Oct 01, 2023

Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:research

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.54

CADD

Benign

9.5

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.67

PhyloP100

0.21

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over