NM_025114.4:c.7035-38C>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):​c.7035-38C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.023 in 1,055,992 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 449 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.036 ( 151 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.021 ( 298 hom. )

Consequence

CEP290
NM_025114.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.172

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
CEP290 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • CEP290-related ciliopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Joubert syndrome 5
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Leber congenital amaurosis 10
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Leber congenital amaurosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Bardet-Biedl syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Meckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Senior-Loken syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 12-88053784-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88053784-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 126267.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.075 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CEP290NM_025114.4 linkc.7035-38C>G intron_variant Intron 51 of 53 ENST00000552810.6 NP_079390.3 O15078Q05BJ6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CEP290ENST00000552810.6 linkc.7035-38C>G intron_variant Intron 51 of 53 1 NM_025114.4 ENSP00000448012.1 O15078

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0356
AC:
5413
AN:
152092
Hom.:
149
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0771
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0296
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0275
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0259
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0340
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0197
AC:
2542
AN:
128932
AF XY:
0.0181
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0781
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0193
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00121
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0254
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0192
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0191
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0208
AC:
18813
AN:
903782
Hom.:
298
Cov.:
12
AF XY:
0.0200
AC XY:
9202
AN XY:
460596
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0796
AC:
1656
AN:
20792
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0196
AC:
510
AN:
26018
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00122
AC:
26
AN:
21270
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0401
AC:
1330
AN:
33166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00363
AC:
218
AN:
60122
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0235
AC:
1048
AN:
44658
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00677
AC:
25
AN:
3694
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0201
AC:
13136
AN:
652372
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0207
AC:
864
AN:
41690
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
924
1849
2773
3698
4622
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
440
880
1320
1760
2200
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0357
AC:
5429
AN:
152210
Hom.:
151
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0354
AC XY:
2635
AN XY:
74418
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0772
AC:
3209
AN:
41542
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0274
AC:
419
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0226
AC:
117
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00290
AC:
14
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0259
AC:
274
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0190
AC:
1293
AN:
68000
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0336
AC:
71
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
259
517
776
1034
1293
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
66
132
198
264
330
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0235
Hom.:
15
Bravo
AF:
0.0360
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0180
AC:
63
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jun 16, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
0.91
DANN
Benign
0.57
PhyloP100
-0.17
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45477492; hg19: chr12-88447561; API