NM_031889.3:c.76A>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_031889.3(ENAM):c.76A>T(p.Ile26Phe) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000396 in 1,613,588 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00042 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

ENAM
NM_031889.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.25

Publications

6 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ENAM (HGNC:3344): (enamelin) Dental enamel forms the outer cap of teeth and is the hardest substance found in vertebrates. This gene encodes the largest protein in the enamel matrix of developing teeth. The protein is involved in the mineralization and structural organization of enamel. Defects in this gene result in amelogenesis imperfect type 1C.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

ENAM Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

amelogenesis imperfecta type 1B
Inheritance: AD, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
amelogenesis imperfecta type 1C
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
amelogenesis imperfecta type 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

ENAM links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010870278).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000158 (24/152328) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00463 (24/5184). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00319. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 11 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AR,AD,SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ENAM	NM_031889.3 link	c.76A>T	p.Ile26Phe	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 9	ENST00000396073.4	NP_114095.2	Q9NRM1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ENAM	ENST00000396073.4 link	c.76A>T	p.Ile26Phe	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 9	1	NM_031889.3	ENSP00000379383.4		Q9NRM1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000158

AC:

AN:

152210

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00462

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000255

AC:

AN:

251152

AF XY:

0.000280

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00343

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000881

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000421

AC:

615

AN:

1461260

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000410

AC XY:

298

AN XY:

726990

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26124

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0152

AC:

603

AN:

39672

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86250

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5758

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000360

AC:

AN:

1111484

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000116

AC:

AN:

60360

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.485

Heterozygous variant carriers

120

160

200

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000158

AC:

AN:

152328

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000148

AC XY:

AN XY:

74484

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41574

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00463

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.000415

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000680

ExAC

AF:

0.000280

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Amelogenesis imperfecta

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.13

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.42

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.38

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.048

Eigen

Uncertain

0.26

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.29

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.93

LIST_S2

Benign

0.70

M_CAP

Benign

0.019

MetaRNN

Benign

0.011

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

2.0

PhyloP100

4.2

PrimateAI

Benign

0.45

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.26

REVEL

Benign

0.16

Sift

Benign

0.15

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.059

Polyphen

0.93

Vest4

0.57

MVP

0.44

MPC

0.094

ClinPred

0.19

GERP RS

4.4

Varity_R

0.053

gMVP

0.22

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.050

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

NM_031889.3:c.76A>T

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over