NM_032830.3:c.535G>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_032830.3(UTP4):c.535G>T(p.Val179Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000152 in 1,614,200 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032830.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTP4 | NM_032830.3 | c.535G>T | p.Val179Phe | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 17 | ENST00000314423.12 | NP_116219.2 | |
UTP4 | NM_001318391.2 | c.286G>T | p.Val96Phe | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 17 | NP_001305320.1 | ||
UTP4 | XM_005256205.4 | c.118G>T | p.Val40Phe | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 13 | XP_005256262.2 | ||
UTP4 | XM_047434817.1 | c.535G>T | p.Val179Phe | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 10 | XP_047290773.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000887 AC: 135AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000275 AC: 69AN: 251068Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000214 AC XY: 29AN XY: 135750
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000739 AC: 108AN: 1461844Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000784 AC XY: 57AN XY: 727222
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000899 AC: 137AN: 152356Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000899 AC XY: 67AN XY: 74514
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
UTP4-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at