NM_033028.5:c.1414A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2

The NM_033028.5(BBS4):​c.1414A>G​(p.Met472Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000404 in 1,614,200 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00040 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BBS4
NM_033028.5 missense

Scores

3
8
8

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:2B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.16
Variant links:
Genes affected
BBS4 (HGNC:969): (Bardet-Biedl syndrome 4) This gene is a member of the Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) gene family. Bardet-Biedl syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by severe pigmentary retinopathy, obesity, polydactyly, renal malformation and cognitive disability. The proteins encoded by BBS gene family members are structurally diverse. The similar phenotypes exhibited by mutations in BBS gene family members are likely due to the protein's shared roles in cilia formation and function. Many BBS proteins localize to the basal bodies, ciliary axonemes, and pericentriolar regions of cells. BBS proteins may also be involved in intracellular trafficking via microtubule-related transport. The protein encoded by this gene has sequence similarity to O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferases in plants and archaebacteria and in human forms a multi-protein "BBSome" complex with seven other BBS proteins. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011805832).
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BBS4NM_033028.5 linkc.1414A>G p.Met472Val missense_variant Exon 15 of 16 ENST00000268057.9 NP_149017.2 Q96RK4-1A0A0S2Z3A9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BBS4ENST00000268057.9 linkc.1414A>G p.Met472Val missense_variant Exon 15 of 16 1 NM_033028.5 ENSP00000268057.4 Q96RK4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000460
AC:
70
AN:
152198
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00943
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000672
AC:
169
AN:
251306
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000655
AC XY:
89
AN XY:
135798
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00794
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000398
AC:
582
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000393
AC XY:
286
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000157
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00995
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000104
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000129
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000364
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000460
AC:
70
AN:
152316
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000537
AC XY:
40
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000144
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00945
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000586
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000529
ExAC
AF:
0.000651
AC:
79
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:2Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 4 Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 18, 2016
Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center
Significance: Likely pathogenic
Review Status: flagged submission
Collection Method: reference population

- -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Oct 11, 2019
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Published functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect, as a zebrafish embryo assay suggests a null mutation (Zaghloul et al., 2010); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in two individuals with nephronophthisis-related ciliopathy, however no second BBS4 variant was identified (Kang et al., 2016); Observed in mother and daughter with Bardet-Biedl syndrome who were both also homozygous for a variant in the BBS1 gene (Beales et al., 2003); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15224652, 20498079, 12677556, 26260382, 27491411, 23142271, 12872256) -

-
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Kyoto University
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: literature only

- -

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 30, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: BBS4 c.1414A>G (p.Met472Val) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00067 in 251306 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0079 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 11.4 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BBS4 causing Bardet-Biedl Syndrome phenotype (0.00069). Although c.1414A>G has been reported in the literature, no penetrant association of this variant has been reported in individuals affected with Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (example, Beales_2003). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Bardet-Biedl Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publication has been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 12677556). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 143161). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.27
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.12
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.40
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.38
.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.29
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.45
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.92
D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.036
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.073
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
.;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.62
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.98
.;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.57
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
.;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.16
T;T
Polyphen
0.15
.;B
Vest4
0.81
MVP
0.86
MPC
0.013
ClinPred
0.086
T
GERP RS
6.0
Varity_R
0.71
gMVP
0.43

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2277596; hg19: chr15-73029268; COSMIC: COSV51438043; COSMIC: COSV51438043; API