NM_033085.3:c.502G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_033085.3(FATE1):c.502G>A(p.Val168Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000182 in 1,097,652 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 1 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V168L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_033085.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_033085.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FATE1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.502G>A | p.Val168Met | missense | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000359375.3 | Q969F0 | ||
| FATE1 | c.502G>A | p.Val168Met | missense | Exon 6 of 6 | ENSP00000610398.1 | ||||
| FATE1 | c.502G>A | p.Val168Met | missense | Exon 6 of 6 | ENSP00000610399.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 24
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000549 AC: 1AN: 182149 AF XY: 0.0000150 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000182 AC: 2AN: 1097652Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 1AN XY: 363076 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 24
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at