NM_033337.3:c.204C>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_033337.3(CAV3):​c.204C>A​(p.Ser68Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000115 in 1,614,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CAV3
NM_033337.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.51

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CAV3 (HGNC:1529): (caveolin 3) This gene encodes a caveolin family member, which functions as a component of the caveolae plasma membranes found in most cell types. Caveolin proteins are proposed to be scaffolding proteins for organizing and concentrating certain caveolin-interacting molecules. Mutations identified in this gene lead to interference with protein oligomerization or intra-cellular routing, disrupting caveolae formation and resulting in Limb-Girdle muscular dystrophy type-1C (LGMD-1C), hyperCKemia or rippling muscle disease (RMD). Alternative splicing has been identified for this locus, with inclusion or exclusion of a differentially spliced intron. In addition, transcripts utilize multiple polyA sites and contain two potential translation initiation sites. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
OXTR (HGNC:8529): (oxytocin receptor) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the G-protein coupled receptor family and acts as a receptor for oxytocin. Its activity is mediated by G proteins which activate a phosphatidylinositol-calcium second messenger system. The oxytocin-oxytocin receptor system plays an important role in the uterus during parturition. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.27).
BP6
Variant 3-8745615-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-8745615-C-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 31711.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.51 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000112 (17/152294) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0027 (14/5176). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00164. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 9 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CAV3NM_033337.3 linkc.204C>A p.Ser68Ser synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 2 ENST00000343849.3 NP_203123.1 P56539
CAV3NM_001234.5 linkc.204C>A p.Ser68Ser synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 3 NP_001225.1 P56539
OXTRXR_007095681.1 linkn.1885-3013G>T intron_variant Intron 4 of 4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CAV3ENST00000343849.3 linkc.204C>A p.Ser68Ser synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 2 1 NM_033337.3 ENSP00000341940.2 P56539
CAV3ENST00000397368.2 linkc.204C>A p.Ser68Ser synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 3 1 ENSP00000380525.2 P56539
CAV3ENST00000472766.1 linkn.155+11625C>A intron_variant Intron 1 of 2 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152176
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00270
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000107
AC:
27
AN:
251194
AF XY:
0.0000958
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000115
AC:
168
AN:
1461840
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000894
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00320
AC:
127
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86242
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000180
AC:
2
AN:
1111980
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000646
AC:
39
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.492
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
23
35
46
58
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152294
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000121
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000653
AC:
1
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00270
AC:
14
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.546
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
5
7
9
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000712
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000718
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00375
AC:
13
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6Other:1
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2022
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CAV3: BP4, BP7 -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 15, 2012
Leiden Muscular Dystrophy (CAV3)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:curation

- -

not specified Benign:4
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 09, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 19, 2014
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ser68Ser in exon 2 of CAV3: This variant is not expected to have clinical signif icance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.6% (1/178) of Japane se chromosomes from a broad population by the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.n cbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP; dbSNP rs116840775). -

Nov 22, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

CAV3-related disorder Benign:1
Mar 27, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Sep 21, 2018
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Caveolinopathy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Long QT syndrome Benign:1
Jan 25, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 11, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.27
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.87
PhyloP100
1.5
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.070
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs116840775; hg19: chr3-8787301; API