NM_053025.4:c.2113C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_053025.4(MYLK):c.2113C>T(p.Arg705Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000235 in 1,614,142 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R705H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_053025.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000629 AC: 158AN: 251214 AF XY: 0.000692 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000248 AC: 362AN: 1461812Hom.: 8 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000322 AC XY: 234AN XY: 727204 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152330Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000188 AC XY: 14AN XY: 74492 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 7 Benign:1
- -
not specified Benign:1
- -
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25944730, 26133393) -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at