NM_053025.4:c.3610C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4
The NM_053025.4(MYLK):c.3610C>T(p.Arg1204Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000147 in 1,603,954 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1204Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_053025.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_053025.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYLK | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.3610C>T | p.Arg1204Trp | missense | Exon 20 of 34 | ENSP00000353452.3 | Q15746-1 | ||
| MYLK | TSL:1 | c.1219C>T | p.Arg407Trp | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000510315.1 | A0A8I5KYZ0 | ||
| MYLK | TSL:1 | n.*3189C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 19 of 33 | ENSP00000417798.1 | F8WBL7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152172Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000141 AC: 33AN: 233298 AF XY: 0.000176 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000147 AC: 213AN: 1451782Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000169 AC XY: 122AN XY: 720808 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152172Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74326 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at