NM_053025.4:c.4268C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_053025.4(MYLK):c.4268C>T(p.Thr1423Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000514 in 1,614,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T1423T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_053025.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_053025.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYLK | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.4268C>T | p.Thr1423Met | missense | Exon 24 of 34 | ENSP00000353452.3 | Q15746-1 | ||
| MYLK | TSL:1 | n.*3847C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 23 of 33 | ENSP00000417798.1 | F8WBL7 | |||
| MYLK | TSL:1 | n.*3847C>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 23 of 33 | ENSP00000417798.1 | F8WBL7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152110Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000120 AC: 3AN: 250524 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000513 AC: 75AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000468 AC XY: 34AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152110Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74292 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at