NM_080390.4:c.11T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_080390.4(TCEAL2):c.11T>C(p.Leu4Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000113 in 1,203,473 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 44 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L4H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_080390.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_080390.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCEAL2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.11T>C | p.Leu4Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000361866.1 | Q9H3H9 | ||
| TCEAL2 | TSL:1 | n.796T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 2 | |||||
| TCEAL2 | TSL:5 | c.11T>C | p.Leu4Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000332359.2 | Q9H3H9 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000267 AC: 3AN: 112159Hom.: 0 Cov.: 24 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000342 AC: 6AN: 175405 AF XY: 0.0000323 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000122 AC: 133AN: 1091314Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000117 AC XY: 42AN XY: 359340 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000267 AC: 3AN: 112159Hom.: 0 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.0000582 AC XY: 2AN XY: 34385 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at