NM_133433.4:c.2256A>G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_133433.4(NIPBL):c.2256A>G(p.Glu752Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000155 in 1,613,708 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00089 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000078 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

NIPBL
NM_133433.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.696

Variant links:

Genes affected

NIPBL (HGNC:28862): (NIPBL cohesin loading factor) This gene encodes the homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B gene product and fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins. The Drosophila protein facilitates enhancer-promoter communication of remote enhancers and plays a role in developmental regulation. It is also homologous to a family of chromosomal adherins with broad roles in sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair. The human protein has a bipartite nuclear targeting sequence and a putative HEAT repeat. Condensins, cohesins and other complexes with chromosome-related functions also contain HEAT repeats. Mutations in this gene result in Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a disorder characterized by dysmorphic facial features, growth delay, limb reduction defects, and cognitive disability. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

NIPBL links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).

BP6

Variant 5-36985436-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-36985436-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 159049.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr5-36985436-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.696 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000894 (136/152190) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00313 (130/41538). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00269. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 67 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 136 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NIPBL	NM_133433.4 link	c.2256A>G	p.Glu752Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 47	ENST00000282516.13	NP_597677.2	Q6KC79-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NIPBL	ENST00000282516.13 link	c.2256A>G	p.Glu752Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 47	1	NM_133433.4	ENSP00000282516.8	Q6KC79-1
NIPBL	ENST00000448238.2 link	c.2256A>G	p.Glu752Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 46	1		ENSP00000406266.2	Q6KC79-2
NIPBL	ENST00000652901.1 link	c.2256A>G	p.Glu752Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 46			ENSP00000499536.1	A0A590UJS4
NIPBL	ENST00000504430.5 link	n.1876A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 6 of 8	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000894

AC:

136

AN:

152072

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00314

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000657

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000193

AC:

AN:

249138

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000163

AC XY:

AN XY:

135152

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00295

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000291

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000780

AC:

114

AN:

1461518

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000605

AC XY:

AN XY:

727042

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00308

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000149

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000894

AC:

136

AN:

152190

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000900

AC XY:

AN XY:

74412

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00313

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000656

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.000360

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000956

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Mar 27, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

5.2

DANN

Benign

0.68

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over