NM_133433.4:c.5863-14_5863-11delATAT
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BS1BS2
The NM_133433.4(NIPBL):c.5863-14_5863-11delATAT variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0187 in 374,450 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00036 ( 0 hom., cov: 0)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.029 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
NIPBL
NM_133433.4 intron
NM_133433.4 intron
Scores
Not classified
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.217
Publications
2 publications found
Genes affected
NIPBL (HGNC:28862): (NIPBL cohesin loading factor) This gene encodes the homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B gene product and fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins. The Drosophila protein facilitates enhancer-promoter communication of remote enhancers and plays a role in developmental regulation. It is also homologous to a family of chromosomal adherins with broad roles in sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair. The human protein has a bipartite nuclear targeting sequence and a putative HEAT repeat. Condensins, cohesins and other complexes with chromosome-related functions also contain HEAT repeats. Mutations in this gene result in Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a disorder characterized by dysmorphic facial features, growth delay, limb reduction defects, and cognitive disability. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
NIPBL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- Cornelia de Lange syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
- Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00036 (49/135974) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.000975 (13/13336). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000576. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 19 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 0. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 49 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIPBL | ENST00000282516.13 | c.5863-31_5863-28delTATA | intron_variant | Intron 32 of 46 | 1 | NM_133433.4 | ENSP00000282516.8 | |||
| NIPBL | ENST00000448238.2 | c.5863-31_5863-28delTATA | intron_variant | Intron 32 of 45 | 1 | ENSP00000406266.2 | ||||
| NIPBL | ENST00000652901.1 | c.5863-31_5863-28delTATA | intron_variant | Intron 32 of 45 | ENSP00000499536.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000353 AC: 48AN: 135982Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
48
AN:
135982
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0369 AC: 1214AN: 32888 AF XY: 0.0393 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
AC:
1214
AN:
32888
AF XY:
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0292 AC: 6957AN: 238476Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0295 AC XY: 3845AN XY: 130222 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
6957
AN:
238476
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3845
AN XY:
130222
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
272
AN:
4058
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
300
AN:
4848
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
289
AN:
6346
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
388
AN:
9372
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
451
AN:
9742
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
240
AN:
19366
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
53
AN:
802
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
4591
AN:
173420
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
373
AN:
10522
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0.000000), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.278
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
606
1212
1817
2423
3029
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
86
172
258
344
430
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000360 AC: 49AN: 135974Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.000291 AC XY: 19AN XY: 65252 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
49
AN:
135974
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
65252
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
36810
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
13
AN:
13336
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
3312
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
4724
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
4286
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
6688
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
270
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
63842
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
1842
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
8
11
14
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.