Genetic Variant NM_144997.7:c.708C>T (chr17-17222572-G-A) – ACMG Classification: Benign (-10 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_144997.7(FLCN):c.708C>T(p.Asn236Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000465 in 1,614,124 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000045 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

FLCN
NM_144997.7 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.761

Variant links:

Genes affected

FLCN (HGNC:27310): (folliculin) This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Mutations in this gene are associated with Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome, which is characterized by fibrofolliculomas, renal tumors, lung cysts, and pneumothorax. Alternative splicing of this gene results in two transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

FLCN links:

ENSG00000264187 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000264187 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).

BP6

Variant 17-17222572-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-17222572-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 460627.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.761 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 9 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FLCN	NM_144997.7 link	c.708C>T	p.Asn236Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 14	ENST00000285071.9	NP_659434.2	Q8NFG4-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FLCN	ENST00000285071.9 link	c.708C>T	p.Asn236Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 14	1	NM_144997.7	ENSP00000285071.4		Q8NFG4-1
ENSG00000264187	ENST00000427497.3 link	n.149-3518C>T		intron_variant	Intron 4 of 11	1		ENSP00000394249.3		J3QW42

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152234

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000942

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000398

AC:

AN:

251382

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000515

AC XY:

AN XY:

135904

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000704

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000451

AC:

AN:

1461890

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000523

AC XY:

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000812

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000468

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000828

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152234

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000807

AC XY:

AN XY:

74368

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0000942

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000956

Alfa

AF:

0.0000987

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000491

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 26, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome

Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dec 04, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial spontaneous pneumothorax

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome 1

Benign:1

Oct 23, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Sep 04, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.54

CADD

Benign

0.71

DANN

Benign

0.92

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over