NM_145720.4:c.1096G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_145720.4(TIGD4):c.1096G>A(p.Val366Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000112 in 1,613,698 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V366L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_145720.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_145720.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIGD4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1096G>A | p.Val366Ile | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000355162.2 | Q8IY51 | ||
| TIGD4 | c.1096G>A | p.Val366Ile | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000562006.1 | ||||
| TIGD4 | c.1096G>A | p.Val366Ile | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000584453.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152154Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251126 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461426Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 726930 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000722 AC: 11AN: 152272Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000672 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74450 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at