NM_152516.4:c.515T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 4P and 4B. PP3_StrongBS2
The NM_152516.4(COMMD1):c.515T>C(p.Leu172Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000413 in 1,453,624 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_152516.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_152516.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMMD1 | MANE Select | c.515T>C | p.Leu172Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | NP_689729.1 | Q8N668-1 | ||
| COMMD1 | c.317T>C | p.Leu106Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | NP_001308710.1 | ||||
| COMMD1 | c.317T>C | p.Leu106Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | NP_001308711.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMMD1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.515T>C | p.Leu172Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000308236.5 | Q8N668-1 | ||
| ENSG00000229839 | TSL:1 | n.308+1666A>G | intron | N/A | |||||
| COMMD1 | c.608T>C | p.Leu203Pro | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000567212.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251418 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000413 AC: 6AN: 1453624Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00000414 AC XY: 3AN XY: 723768 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at