NM_152618.3:c.1859A>G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBS1BS2

The NM_152618.3(BBS12):c.1859A>G(p.Gln620Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000554 in 1,614,064 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q620E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00046 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00056 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BBS12
NM_152618.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:10B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.14

Publications

7 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BBS12 (HGNC:26648): (Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12) The protein encoded by this gene is part of a complex that is involved in membrane trafficking. The encoded protein is a molecular chaperone that aids in protein folding upon ATP hydrolysis. This protein also plays a role in adipocyte differentiation. Defects in this gene are a cause of Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 12. Two transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2010]

BBS12 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Myriad Women’s Health, G2P, Ambry Genetics
BBS12-related ciliopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

BBS12 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.10503021).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00046 (70/152214) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000897 (61/68038). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000716. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 33 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_152618.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	BBS12	NM_152618.3	MANE Select	c.1859A>G	p.Gln620Arg	missense	Exon 2 of 2	NP_689831.2
	BBS12	NM_001178007.2		c.1859A>G	p.Gln620Arg	missense	Exon 3 of 3	NP_001171478.1	Q6ZW61

Ensembl Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	BBS12	ENST00000314218.8	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.1859A>G	p.Gln620Arg	missense	Exon 2 of 2	ENSP00000319062.3	Q6ZW61
	BBS12	ENST00000542236.5	TSL:2	c.1859A>G	p.Gln620Arg	missense	Exon 3 of 3	ENSP00000438273.1	Q6ZW61

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000460

AC:

AN:

152214

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000392

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000897

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000557

AC:

140

AN:

251288

AF XY:

0.000560

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000298

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000942

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000815

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000564

AC:

824

AN:

1461850

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000576

AC XY:

419

AN XY:

727214

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000119

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000715

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000689

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000301

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53388

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00260

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000612

AC:

681

AN:

1112002

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000795

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.481

Heterozygous variant carriers

105

158

210

263

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000460

AC:

AN:

152214

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000444

AC XY:

AN XY:

74350

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000483

AC:

AN:

41446

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000392

AC:

AN:

15288

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000288

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5198

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000897

AC:

AN:

68038

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2094

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.513

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000684

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000536

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000778

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00105

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000568

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00164

EpiControl

AF:

0.00124

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Revision:criteria provided, conflicting classifications

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 12 (4)

not provided (3)

Bardet-Biedl syndrome (1)

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1 (1)

BBS12-related ciliopathy (1)

BBS12-related disorder (1)

not specified (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.095

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.27

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.23

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.069

Eigen

Uncertain

0.29

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.25

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.85

LIST_S2

Benign

0.62

M_CAP

Benign

0.027

MetaRNN

Benign

0.11

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.61

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.7

PhyloP100

4.1

PrimateAI

Benign

0.27

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.3

REVEL

Benign

0.22

Sift

Benign

0.031

Sift4G

Benign

0.062

Polyphen

0.93

Vest4

0.24

MVP

0.81

MPC

0.41

ClinPred

0.093

GERP RS

5.8

Varity_R

0.17

gMVP

0.28

Mutation Taster

=75/25

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over