NM_152783.5:c.1258G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_152783.5(D2HGDH):​c.1258G>A​(p.Ala420Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00295 in 1,604,926 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0023 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0030 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

D2HGDH
NM_152783.5 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.441

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
D2HGDH (HGNC:28358): (D-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase) This gene encodes D-2hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase, a mitochondrial enzyme belonging to the FAD-binding oxidoreductase/transferase type 4 family. This enzyme, which is most active in liver and kidney but also active in heart and brain, converts D-2-hydroxyglutarate to 2-ketoglutarate. Mutations in this gene are present in D-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria, a rare recessive neurometabolic disorder causing developmental delay, epilepsy, hypotonia, and dysmorphic features. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
D2HGDH Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • D-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • D-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 7 uncertain in NM_152783.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015416682).
BP6
Variant 2-241755966-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-241755966-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 158409.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00233 (355/152292) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00337 (229/68012). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00301. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 152 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 9 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
D2HGDHNM_152783.5 linkc.1258G>A p.Ala420Thr missense_variant Exon 9 of 10 ENST00000321264.9 NP_689996.4 Q8N465-1B4E3K7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
D2HGDHENST00000321264.9 linkc.1258G>A p.Ala420Thr missense_variant Exon 9 of 10 1 NM_152783.5 ENSP00000315351.4 Q8N465-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00234
AC:
356
AN:
152174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000772
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00321
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00338
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00220
AC:
545
AN:
248050
AF XY:
0.00229
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000497
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00237
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00302
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00296
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00302
AC:
4380
AN:
1452634
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.00296
AC XY:
2137
AN XY:
720814
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000571
AC:
19
AN:
33270
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00146
AC:
65
AN:
44500
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00150
AC:
39
AN:
26040
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000508
AC:
2
AN:
39398
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00214
AC:
184
AN:
86094
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00234
AC:
122
AN:
52230
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000870
AC:
5
AN:
5744
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00345
AC:
3810
AN:
1105474
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00224
AC:
134
AN:
59884
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
271
541
812
1082
1353
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
150
300
450
600
750
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00233
AC:
355
AN:
152292
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00204
AC XY:
152
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000770
AC:
32
AN:
41564
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00320
AC:
49
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00248
AC:
12
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00245
AC:
26
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00337
AC:
229
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000947
AC:
2
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.494
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18
37
55
74
92
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00261
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00236
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00485
AC:
18
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00285
AC:
11
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000681
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00291
AC:
25
ExAC
AF:
0.00218
AC:
264
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00284
EpiControl
AF:
0.00308

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

D-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Nov 19, 2015
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jan 15, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
Dec 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

D2HGDH: BP4, BS2 -

D2HGDH-related disorder Benign:1
Oct 07, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.068
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.39
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.33
CADD
Benign
3.8
DANN
Benign
0.97
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.16
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.66
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.79
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.093
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.82
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.43
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L;.
PhyloP100
0.44
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.84
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.15
Sift
Benign
0.27
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.30
T;T
Polyphen
0.0080
B;.
Vest4
0.16
MVP
0.74
MPC
0.37
ClinPred
0.0036
T
GERP RS
0.86
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.049
gMVP
0.53
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149504235; hg19: chr2-242695381; COSMIC: COSV58319312; COSMIC: COSV58319312; API