NM_153026.3:c.2304C>G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_153026.3(PRICKLE1):c.2304C>G(p.Ser768Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00101 in 1,613,436 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S768S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0055 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00054 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

PRICKLE1
NM_153026.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0650

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PRICKLE1 (HGNC:17019): (prickle planar cell polarity protein 1) This gene encodes a nuclear receptor that may be a negative regulator of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. The encoded protein localizes to the nuclear membrane and has been implicated in the nuclear trafficking of the transcription repressors REST/NRSF and REST4. Mutations in this gene have been linked to progressive myoclonus epilepsy. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. A pseudogene of this gene is found on chromosome 3. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

PRICKLE1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

epilepsy, progressive myoclonic, 1B
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Unverricht-Lundborg syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
progressive myoclonus epilepsy
Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
epilepsy
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

PRICKLE1 links:

ENSG00000257225 (HGNC:58444):

ENSG00000257225 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).

BP6

Variant 12-42460001-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-42460001-G-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 96507.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.065 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00545 (830/152216) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0191 (793/41526). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.018. There are 7 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 383 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PRICKLE1	NM_153026.3 link	c.2304C>G	p.Ser768Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 8	ENST00000345127.9	NP_694571.2	Q96MT3A0A024R0W7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PRICKLE1	ENST00000345127.9 link	c.2304C>G	p.Ser768Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 8	1	NM_153026.3	ENSP00000345064.3		Q96MT3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00543

AC:

826

AN:

152098

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0191

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00157

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00145

AC:

364

AN:

251414

AF XY:

0.000883

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0198

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000896

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000352

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000815

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000543

AC:

793

AN:

1461220

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000476

AC XY:

346

AN XY:

727002

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0182

AC:

609

AN:

33456

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00107

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39694

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000580

AC:

AN:

86244

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000347

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

1111420

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00133

AC:

AN:

60368

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.487

Heterozygous variant carriers

102

153

204

255

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

110

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00545

AC:

830

AN:

152216

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00515

AC XY:

383

AN XY:

74410

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0191

AC:

793

AN:

41526

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00157

AC:

AN:

15286

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5162

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000103

AC:

AN:

68014

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00284

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

122

163

204

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000336

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00589

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Jan 16, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jul 05, 2013

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 07, 2024

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 13, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Epilepsy, progressive myoclonic, 1B

Benign:1

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

PRICKLE1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jul 18, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.46

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.75

PhyloP100

-0.065

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over