NM_153265.3:c.1493G>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_153265.3(EML3):c.1493G>T(p.Gly498Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,646 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153265.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_153265.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EML3 | MANE Select | c.1493G>T | p.Gly498Val | missense | Exon 12 of 22 | NP_694997.2 | Q32P44-1 | ||
| EML3 | c.1496G>T | p.Gly499Val | missense | Exon 12 of 22 | NP_001287722.1 | ||||
| EML3 | c.1493G>T | p.Gly498Val | missense | Exon 12 of 22 | NP_001287723.1 | Q32P44-2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EML3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1493G>T | p.Gly498Val | missense | Exon 12 of 22 | ENSP00000378254.2 | Q32P44-1 | ||
| EML3 | c.1604G>T | p.Gly535Val | missense | Exon 13 of 23 | ENSP00000634851.1 | ||||
| EML3 | TSL:2 | c.1493G>T | p.Gly498Val | missense | Exon 12 of 22 | ENSP00000434513.1 | Q32P44-2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251220 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461646Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727136 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at