NM_174892.4:c.161G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_174892.4(CD300LB):c.161G>A(p.Arg54His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000192 in 1,613,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R54C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_174892.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_174892.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD300LB | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.161G>A | p.Arg54His | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | ENSP00000376397.2 | A8K4G0 | ||
| CD300LB | c.161G>A | p.Arg54His | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | ENSP00000520719.1 | A8K4G0 | |||
| CD300LB | TSL:2 | c.161G>A | p.Arg54His | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000317337.4 | J9JID3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152100Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251454 AF XY: 0.0000294 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000109 AC: 16AN: 1461880Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000825 AC XY: 6AN XY: 727242 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152100Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000942 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74296 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at