NM_175914.5:c.1243C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_175914.5(HNF4A):c.1243C>T(p.Pro415Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000364 in 1,614,132 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00017 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

HNF4A
NM_175914.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.57

Variant links:

Genes affected

HNF4A (HGNC:5024): (hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha) The protein encoded by this gene is a nuclear transcription factor which binds DNA as a homodimer. The encoded protein controls the expression of several genes, including hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha, a transcription factor which regulates the expression of several hepatic genes. This gene may play a role in development of the liver, kidney, and intestines. Mutations in this gene have been associated with monogenic autosomal dominant non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type I. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants encoding several different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

HNF4A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01056692).

BP6

Variant 20-44429549-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-44429549-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 211145.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000171 (26/152252) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00519 (25/4816). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00361. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 19 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 26 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
HNF4A	NM_175914.5 link	c.1243C>T	p.Pro415Ser	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 10	ENST00000316673.9	NP_787110.2	P41235-5F1D8T0

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
HNF4A	ENST00000316673.9 link	c.1243C>T	p.Pro415Ser	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 10	1	NM_175914.5	ENSP00000315180.4		P41235-5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000171

AC:

AN:

152134

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00519

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000729

AC:

183

AN:

251160

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00102

AC XY:

139

AN XY:

135790

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00588

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000881

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000384

AC:

562

AN:

1461880

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000586

AC XY:

426

AN XY:

727238

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00621

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000629

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000281

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000171

AC:

AN:

152252

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000255

AC XY:

AN XY:

74452

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00519

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000483

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000453

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000832

AC:

101

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Maturity onset diabetes mellitus in young

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

Mutations in HNF4A are associated with poor insulin secretion in response to hyperglycemia and lead to MODY1. Patients initially respond well to sulfonylureas but eventually become insulin dependent. However, no sufficient evidence found for role of this particular variant rs150776703 in DM and MODY yet. -

Oct 29, 2024

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Familial hyperinsulinism

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Jun 10, 2015

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Dec 15, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 1

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.18

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.27

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.16

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.32

.;.;T;D;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.63

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.66

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.95

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.13

MetaRNN

Benign

0.011

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.043

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.6

.;.;.;M;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.68

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.5

N;N;.;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.24

Sift

Benign

0.035

D;T;.;D;T

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.055

T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

1.0, 0.087

.;D;.;B;.

Vest4

0.46

MVP

0.73

MPC

0.99

ClinPred

0.13

GERP RS

5.2

Varity_R

0.10

gMVP

0.64

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over