NM_175914.5:c.393T>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_175914.5(HNF4A):​c.393T>C​(p.Asn131Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00182 in 1,613,766 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 35 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0059 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 31 hom. )

Consequence

HNF4A
NM_175914.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.38

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
HNF4A (HGNC:5024): (hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha) The protein encoded by this gene is a nuclear transcription factor which binds DNA as a homodimer. The encoded protein controls the expression of several genes, including hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha, a transcription factor which regulates the expression of several hepatic genes. This gene may play a role in development of the liver, kidney, and intestines. Mutations in this gene have been associated with monogenic autosomal dominant non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type I. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants encoding several different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
HNF4A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • monogenic diabetes
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • diabetes mellitus, noninsulin-dependent
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • Fanconi renotubular syndrome 4 with maturity-onset diabetes of the young
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • hyperinsulinism due to HNF4A deficiency
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • maturity-onset diabetes of the young
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).
BP6
Variant 20-44413767-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-44413767-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 36351.We mark this variant Benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.38 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00595 (905/152208) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0188 (782/41518). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0177. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 440 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 905 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
HNF4ANM_175914.5 linkc.393T>C p.Asn131Asn synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 10 ENST00000316673.9 NP_787110.2 P41235-5F1D8T0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
HNF4AENST00000316673.9 linkc.393T>C p.Asn131Asn synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 10 1 NM_175914.5 ENSP00000315180.4 P41235-5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00588
AC:
895
AN:
152090
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0186
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00310
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0139
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00331
AC:
829
AN:
250482
AF XY:
0.00337
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0188
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00185
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000353
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00139
AC:
2036
AN:
1461558
Hom.:
31
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00168
AC XY:
1221
AN XY:
727068
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0196
AC:
657
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00125
AC:
56
AN:
44704
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00166
AC:
66
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0125
AC:
1074
AN:
86182
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53374
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000867
AC:
5
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000153
AC:
17
AN:
1111838
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00267
AC:
161
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
140
280
420
560
700
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
38
76
114
152
190
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00595
AC:
905
AN:
152208
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00591
AC XY:
440
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0188
AC:
782
AN:
41518
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00216
AC:
33
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00310
AC:
16
AN:
5154
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0139
AC:
67
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68024
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00332
AC:
7
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
43
85
128
170
213
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00573
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.00631
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0130
AC:
44
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 14, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Oct 14, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 30, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 1 Benign:2
Aug 18, 2011
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing;curation

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Type 2 diabetes mellitus Uncertain:1
-
Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Mutations in HNF4A are associated with poor insulin secretion in response to hyperglycemia. These are associated with MODY1. Patients initially respond well to sulfonylureas but eventually become insulin dependent. However, no sufficient evidence was found for role of rs113308087 variant in T2DM. -

Familial hyperinsulinism Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Maturity onset diabetes mellitus in young Benign:1
Nov 16, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.74
CADD
Benign
0.028
DANN
Benign
0.45
PhyloP100
-2.4
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs113308087; hg19: chr20-43042407; COSMIC: COSV107335566; API