NM_177987.3:c.940G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PM2PM5PP2
The NM_177987.3(TUBB8):c.940G>C(p.Ala314Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A314S) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_177987.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- oocyte maturation defect 2Inheritance: SD, AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_177987.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUBB8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.940G>C | p.Ala314Pro | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000456206.2 | Q3ZCM7 | ||
| TUBB8 | TSL:5 | c.838G>C | p.Ala280Pro | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000457610.1 | Q5SQY0 | ||
| TUBB8 | TSL:5 | c.829G>C | p.Ala277Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000457062.1 | A0A075B736 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 28
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000158 AC: 39AN: 246374 AF XY: 0.000164 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 0.00000411 AC: 6AN: 1459722Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000689 AC XY: 5AN XY: 726208 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 28
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at