NM_181882.3:c.3218A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_181882.3(PRX):​c.3218A>G​(p.Glu1073Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00185 in 1,614,060 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 43 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0099 ( 24 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 19 hom. )

Consequence

PRX
NM_181882.3 missense

Scores

2
3
13

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.512

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PRX (HGNC:13797): (periaxin) This gene encodes a protein involved in peripheral nerve myelin upkeep. The encoded protein contains 2 PDZ domains which were named after PSD95 (post synaptic density protein), DlgA (Drosophila disc large tumor suppressor), and ZO1 (a mammalian tight junction protein). Two alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described for this gene which encode different protein isoforms and which are targeted differently in the Schwann cell. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuoropathy, type 4F and Dejerine-Sottas neuropathy. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
PRX Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4F
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 3
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0031867921).
BP6
Variant 19-40395134-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-40395134-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 329259.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00991 (1509/152228) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.034 (1411/41520). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0325. There are 24 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 733 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 24 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PRXNM_181882.3 linkc.3218A>G p.Glu1073Gly missense_variant Exon 7 of 7 ENST00000324001.8 NP_870998.2 Q9BXM0-1
PRXNM_001411127.1 linkc.3503A>G p.Glu1168Gly missense_variant Exon 7 of 7 NP_001398056.1
PRXXM_017027047.2 linkc.3116A>G p.Glu1039Gly missense_variant Exon 4 of 4 XP_016882536.1
PRXNM_020956.2 linkc.*3423A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 6 of 6 NP_066007.1 Q9BXM0-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PRXENST00000324001.8 linkc.3218A>G p.Glu1073Gly missense_variant Exon 7 of 7 1 NM_181882.3 ENSP00000326018.6 Q9BXM0-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00992
AC:
1509
AN:
152110
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0341
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00478
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00910
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00252
AC:
633
AN:
251326
AF XY:
0.00184
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0348
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000114
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00101
AC:
1474
AN:
1461832
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
99
AF XY:
0.000886
AC XY:
644
AN XY:
727218
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0368
AC:
1232
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00143
AC:
64
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000348
AC:
3
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53380
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00225
AC:
13
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000459
AC:
51
AN:
1111998
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00184
AC:
111
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
116
231
347
462
578
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
42
84
126
168
210
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00991
AC:
1509
AN:
152228
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00985
AC XY:
733
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0340
AC:
1411
AN:
41520
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00477
AC:
73
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5168
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000882
AC:
6
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00900
AC:
19
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
80
159
239
318
398
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00371
Hom.:
22
Bravo
AF:
0.0114
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0338
AC:
149
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00317
AC:
385
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Dec 12, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Dec 12, 2020
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
-
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Sep 16, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4F Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.098
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.53
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.14
T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.39
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.35
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.35
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.73
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0032
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.72
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.0
M
PhyloP100
0.51
PrimateAI
Benign
0.34
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.2
N
REVEL
Benign
0.11
Sift
Uncertain
0.0090
D
Sift4G
Benign
0.13
T
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.25
MVP
0.70
MPC
0.61
ClinPred
0.068
T
GERP RS
4.7
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.18
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61733451; hg19: chr19-40901041; API