NM_182632.3:c.-29T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_182632.3(SLC6A18):c.-29T>C variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.774 in 1,591,902 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 479,117 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_182632.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_182632.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLC6A18 | NM_182632.3 | MANE Select | c.-29T>C | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 12 | NP_872438.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLC6A18 | ENST00000324642.4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.-29T>C | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 1 of 12 | ENSP00000323549.3 | |||
| SLC6A18 | ENST00000513607.2 | TSL:3 | n.41T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.776 AC: 117858AN: 151964Hom.: 45880 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.754 AC: 165613AN: 219550 AF XY: 0.754 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.774 AC: 1114834AN: 1439820Hom.: 433196 Cov.: 41 AF XY: 0.773 AC XY: 552713AN XY: 715082 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.776 AC: 117961AN: 152082Hom.: 45921 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.774 AC XY: 57580AN XY: 74378 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at