NM_198428.3:c.2216C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2_Supporting

The NM_198428.3(BBS9):​c.2216C>T​(p.Ala739Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000566 in 1,614,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A739T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0027 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

BBS9
NM_198428.3 missense

Scores

2
16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.73

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BBS9 (HGNC:30000): (Bardet-Biedl syndrome 9) This gene is downregulated by parathyroid hormone in osteoblastic cells, and therefore is thought to be involved in parathyroid hormone action in bones. The exact function of this gene has not yet been determined. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2017]
BBS9 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Bardet-Biedl syndrome 9
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • ciliopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Bardet-Biedl syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0073854923).
BP6
Variant 7-33505563-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-33505563-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 210514.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00273 (416/152344) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0095 (395/41584). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00873. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 182 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BBS9NM_198428.3 linkc.2216C>T p.Ala739Val missense_variant Exon 20 of 23 ENST00000242067.11 NP_940820.1 Q3SYG4-1A0A090N8P4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BBS9ENST00000242067.11 linkc.2216C>T p.Ala739Val missense_variant Exon 20 of 23 1 NM_198428.3 ENSP00000242067.6 Q3SYG4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00271
AC:
413
AN:
152226
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00945
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000720
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000773
AC:
194
AN:
250868
AF XY:
0.000539
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000260
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000706
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000654
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000341
AC:
498
AN:
1461774
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000292
AC XY:
212
AN XY:
727186
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0104
AC:
348
AN:
33462
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000514
AC:
23
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000580
AC:
5
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000522
AC:
3
AN:
5746
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000782
AC:
87
AN:
1111958
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000530
AC:
32
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
31
61
92
122
153
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00273
AC:
416
AN:
152344
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00244
AC XY:
182
AN XY:
74494
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00950
AC:
395
AN:
41584
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000719
AC:
11
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
3
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00237
AC:
5
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20
41
61
82
102
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00102
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00322
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0138
AC:
61
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000955
AC:
116
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Jul 24, 2018
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 17, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1 Benign:2
May 31, 2017
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 15, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 9 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome Benign:1
Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.044
T;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.30
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.097
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.62
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0074
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.55
N;.;.;.
PhyloP100
4.7
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.067
Sift
Benign
0.076
T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.16
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.29
B;B;B;.
Vest4
0.25
MVP
0.33
MPC
0.063
ClinPred
0.012
T
GERP RS
4.9
Varity_R
0.13
gMVP
0.25
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs116483694; hg19: chr7-33545175; API