NM_201384.3:c.12691G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 1P and 0B. PP3
The NM_201384.3(PLEC):c.12691G>A(p.Glu4231Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000152 in 1,452,014 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_201384.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- epidermolysis bullosa simplexInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
- epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5A, Ogna typeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp
- autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2QInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- congenital myasthenic syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5B, with muscular dystrophyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
- epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5C, with pyloric atresiaInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- epidermolysis bullosa simplex with nail dystrophyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia
- autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophyInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
- aplasia cutis congenitaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- cholestasisInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLEC | ENST00000345136.8 | c.12691G>A | p.Glu4231Lys | missense_variant | Exon 32 of 32 | 1 | NM_201384.3 | ENSP00000344848.3 | ||
| PLEC | ENST00000356346.7 | c.12649G>A | p.Glu4217Lys | missense_variant | Exon 32 of 32 | 1 | NM_201378.4 | ENSP00000348702.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000282 AC: 7AN: 247892 AF XY: 0.0000149 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000152 AC: 22AN: 1452014Hom.: 0 Cov.: 59 AF XY: 0.0000125 AC XY: 9AN XY: 720044 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Epidermolysis bullosa simplex, Ogna type;C2677349:Epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5C, with pyloric atresia;C2931072:Epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5B, with muscular dystrophy;C3150989:Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2Q;C4225309:Epidermolysis bullosa simplex with nail dystrophy Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces glutamic acid with lysine at codon 4258 of the PLEC protein (p.Glu4258Lys). The glutamic acid residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between glutamic acid and lysine. This variant is present in population databases (rs782341944, ExAC 0.009%) but has not been reported in the literature in individuals with a PLEC-related disease. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies. In summary, this variant is a rare missense change with uncertain impact on protein function. There is no indication that it causes disease, but the available evidence is currently insufficient to prove that conclusively. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at