NM_201628.3:c.226+84101T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_201628.3(KAZN):c.226+84101T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.534 in 152,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21,713 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_201628.3 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_201628.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAZN | NM_201628.3 | MANE Select | c.226+84101T>C | intron | N/A | NP_963922.2 | |||
| KAZN | NM_001437721.1 | c.226+84101T>C | intron | N/A | NP_001424650.1 | ||||
| KAZN | NM_015209.3 | c.226+84101T>C | intron | N/A | NP_056024.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAZN | ENST00000376030.7 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.226+84101T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000365198.2 | |||
| KAZN | ENST00000503743.5 | TSL:1 | c.226+84101T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000426015.1 | |||
| KAZN | ENST00000636203.1 | TSL:5 | c.490+84101T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000490958.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.533 AC: 81035AN: 151896Hom.: 21689 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.534 AC: 81108AN: 152018Hom.: 21713 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.533 AC XY: 39583AN XY: 74292 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at