NM_203447.4:c.2739C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_203447.4(DOCK8):c.2739C>T(p.Ser913Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00201 in 1,614,142 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 60 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S913S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 31 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 29 hom. )

Consequence

DOCK8
NM_203447.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.04

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DOCK8 (HGNC:19191): (dedicator of cytokinesis 8) This gene encodes a member of the DOCK180 family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors interact with Rho GTPases and are components of intracellular signaling networks. Mutations in this gene result in the autosomal recessive form of the hyper-IgE syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described.[provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]

DOCK8 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

combined immunodeficiency due to DOCK8 deficiency
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
complex neurodevelopmental disorder
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

DOCK8 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.7).

BP6

Variant 9-382646-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-382646-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 366927.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.04 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0104 (1589/152258) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0354 (1472/41550). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0339. There are 31 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 733 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 31 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DOCK8	NM_203447.4 link	c.2739C>T	p.Ser913Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 22 of 48	ENST00000432829.7	NP_982272.2	Q8NF50-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DOCK8	ENST00000432829.7 link	c.2739C>T	p.Ser913Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 22 of 48	1	NM_203447.4	ENSP00000394888.3		Q8NF50-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0104

AC:

1585

AN:

152140

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0354

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00524

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000176

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0110

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00281

AC:

705

AN:

250862

AF XY:

0.00207

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0370

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00202

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000230

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00113

AC:

1657

AN:

1461884

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000968

AC XY:

704

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0384

AC:

1284

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00197

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000696

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00191

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000129

AC:

143

AN:

1112008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00207

AC:

125

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.479

Heterozygous variant carriers

101

202

303

404

505

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

126

168

210

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0104

AC:

1589

AN:

152258

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00985

AC XY:

733

AN XY:

74442

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0354

AC:

1472

AN:

41550

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00523

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000415

AC:

AN:

4818

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10602

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000176

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0109

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.498

Heterozygous variant carriers

158

237

316

395

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00526

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0120

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Combined immunodeficiency due to DOCK8 deficiency

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Benign:1

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.70

CADD

Benign

1.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.50

PhyloP100

-1.0

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over