NM_203486.3:c.1674-10C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_203486.3(DLL3):​c.1674-10C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00158 in 1,614,092 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0087 ( 14 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00083 ( 15 hom. )

Consequence

DLL3
NM_203486.3 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00004291
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0410

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DLL3 (HGNC:2909): (delta like canonical Notch ligand 3) This gene encodes a member of the delta protein ligand family. This family functions as Notch ligands that are characterized by a DSL domain, EGF repeats, and a transmembrane domain. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive spondylocostal dysostosis 1. Two transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
DLL3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • spondylocostal dysostosis 1, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • autosomal recessive spondylocostal dysostosis
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 19-39507820-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-39507820-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 260777.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00873 (1329/152260) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0291 (1207/41532). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0277. There are 14 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 614 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 14 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DLL3NM_203486.3 linkc.1674-10C>T intron_variant Intron 7 of 8 ENST00000356433.10 NP_982353.1 Q9NYJ7-2
DLL3NM_016941.4 linkc.1674-10C>T intron_variant Intron 7 of 7 NP_058637.1 Q9NYJ7-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DLL3ENST00000356433.10 linkc.1674-10C>T intron_variant Intron 7 of 8 2 NM_203486.3 ENSP00000348810.4 Q9NYJ7-2
DLL3ENST00000205143.4 linkc.1674-10C>T intron_variant Intron 7 of 7 1 ENSP00000205143.3 Q9NYJ7-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00874
AC:
1329
AN:
152142
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0291
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00649
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00717
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00226
AC:
567
AN:
251310
AF XY:
0.00154
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0291
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00194
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000814
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000834
AC:
1219
AN:
1461832
Hom.:
15
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000721
AC XY:
524
AN XY:
727212
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0274
AC:
917
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00208
AC:
93
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000104
AC:
9
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53406
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00139
AC:
8
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000737
AC:
82
AN:
1111974
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00180
AC:
109
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.468
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
71
143
214
286
357
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
30
60
90
120
150
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00873
AC:
1329
AN:
152260
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00825
AC XY:
614
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0291
AC:
1207
AN:
41532
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00648
AC:
99
AN:
15280
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000103
AC:
7
AN:
68024
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00710
AC:
15
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
69
139
208
278
347
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00721
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.0103
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Dec 05, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Spondylocostal dysostosis 1, autosomal recessive Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 14, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Syndactyly Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
6.4
DANN
Benign
0.58
PhyloP100
0.041
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000043
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs116099821; hg19: chr19-39998460; API