NM_207336.3:c.1756C>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_207336.3(ZNF467):c.1756C>G(p.Pro586Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000187 in 1,548,390 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P586H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_207336.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_207336.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZNF467 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1756C>G | p.Pro586Ala | missense | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000304769.3 | Q7Z7K2 | ||
| ZNF467 | c.1876C>G | p.Pro626Ala | missense | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000552933.1 | ||||
| ZNF467 | c.1756C>G | p.Pro586Ala | missense | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000552920.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152252Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000533 AC: 1AN: 187702 AF XY: 0.00000982 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000136 AC: 19AN: 1396022Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000146 AC XY: 10AN XY: 686094 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000656 AC: 10AN: 152368Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000671 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74514 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at