X-101398538-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 3P and 4B. PM1PP3BS2
The ENST00000218516.4(GLA):āc.831G>Cā(p.Trp277Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000972 in 1,203,632 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 39 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. W277G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000218516.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLA | NM_000169.3 | c.831G>C | p.Trp277Cys | missense_variant | 6/7 | ENST00000218516.4 | NP_000160.1 | |
RPL36A-HNRNPH2 | NM_001199973.2 | c.300+3081C>G | intron_variant | NP_001186902.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLA | ENST00000218516.4 | c.831G>C | p.Trp277Cys | missense_variant | 6/7 | 1 | NM_000169.3 | ENSP00000218516 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000180 AC: 2AN: 111339Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 33565
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000105 AC: 115AN: 1092293Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000109 AC XY: 39AN XY: 357743
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000180 AC: 2AN: 111339Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 33565
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Fabry disease Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Mar 05, 2024 | This missense variant replaces tryptophan with cysteine at codon 277 of the GLA protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with GLA-related disorders in the literature. This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 09, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Mar 29, 2022 | This sequence change replaces tryptophan, which is neutral and slightly polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 277 of the GLA protein (p.Trp277Cys). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with GLA-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 524211). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Possibly Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C15"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Dec 02, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at