X-120560261-TGAGGAGGAG-TGAGGAGGAGGAG
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP3BP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001079872.2(CUL4B):c.377_378insCTC(p.Ser127dup) variant causes a inframe insertion change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000306 in 1,208,157 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 10 hemizygotes in GnomAD. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000054 ( 0 hom., 2 hem., cov: 22)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000028 ( 0 hom. 8 hem. )
Consequence
CUL4B
NM_001079872.2 inframe_insertion
NM_001079872.2 inframe_insertion
Scores
Not classified
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.84
Genes affected
CUL4B (HGNC:2555): (cullin 4B) This gene is a member of the cullin family. The encoded protein forms a complex that functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase and catalyzes the polyubiquitination of specific protein substrates in the cell. The protein interacts with a ring finger protein, and is required for the proteolysis of several regulators of DNA replication including chromatin licensing and DNA replication factor 1 and cyclin E. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP3
Nonframeshift variant in repetitive region in NM_001079872.2
BP6
Variant X-120560261-T-TGAG is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-120560261-T-TGAG is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 420582.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 XL gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUL4B | NM_001079872.2 | c.377_378insCTC | p.Ser127dup | inframe_insertion | 1/20 | ENST00000371322.11 | NP_001073341.1 | |
CUL4B | NM_001330624.2 | c.392_393insCTC | p.Ser132dup | inframe_insertion | 2/21 | NP_001317553.1 | ||
CUL4B | NM_003588.4 | c.431_432insCTC | p.Ser145dup | inframe_insertion | 3/22 | NP_003579.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUL4B | ENST00000371322.11 | c.377_378insCTC | p.Ser127dup | inframe_insertion | 1/20 | 1 | NM_001079872.2 | ENSP00000360373 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000540 AC: 6AN: 111014Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.0000600 AC XY: 2AN XY: 33340
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
111014
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
33340
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000404 AC: 7AN: 173145Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000325 AC XY: 2AN XY: 61627
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
173145
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
61627
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000283 AC: 31AN: 1097143Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000220 AC XY: 8AN XY: 362877
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
31
AN:
1097143
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
362877
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000540 AC: 6AN: 111014Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.0000600 AC XY: 2AN XY: 33340
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
111014
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
33340
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
CUL4B-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 02, 2024 | The CUL4B c.429_431dupCTC variant is predicted to result in an in-frame duplication (p.Ser146dup). This variant was reported in an individual with intellectual disability and additional features consistent with CUL4B-related disease (Tzschach et al 2015. PubMed ID: 25649377). This variant is reported in 0.014% of alleles in individuals of East Asian descent in gnomAD, including three hemizygotes. The gnomAD data suggest it is less likely that this is a pathogenic variant. However, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 01, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
X-linked intellectual disability Cabezas type Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | May 16, 2023 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 06, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at