chrX-120560261-T-TGAG
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP3BP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001079872.2(CUL4B):c.375_377dupCTC(p.Ser126dup) variant causes a disruptive inframe insertion change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000306 in 1,208,157 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 10 hemizygotes in GnomAD. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001079872.2 disruptive_inframe_insertion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUL4B | NM_001079872.2 | c.375_377dupCTC | p.Ser126dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 20 | ENST00000371322.11 | NP_001073341.1 | |
CUL4B | NM_003588.4 | c.429_431dupCTC | p.Ser144dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 3 of 22 | NP_003579.3 | ||
CUL4B | NM_001330624.2 | c.390_392dupCTC | p.Ser131dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 2 of 21 | NP_001317553.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUL4B | ENST00000371322.11 | c.375_377dupCTC | p.Ser126dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 20 | 1 | NM_001079872.2 | ENSP00000360373.5 | ||
CUL4B | ENST00000681206.1 | c.390_392dupCTC | p.Ser131dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 2 of 23 | ENSP00000505480.1 | ||||
CUL4B | ENST00000680673.1 | c.429_431dupCTC | p.Ser144dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 3 of 22 | ENSP00000505084.1 | ||||
CUL4B | ENST00000681253.1 | c.429_431dupCTC | p.Ser144dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 4 of 23 | ENSP00000506259.1 | ||||
CUL4B | ENST00000681652.1 | c.429_431dupCTC | p.Ser144dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 6 of 25 | ENSP00000505176.1 | ||||
CUL4B | ENST00000336592.11 | c.390_392dupCTC | p.Ser131dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 2 of 21 | 5 | ENSP00000338919.6 | |||
CUL4B | ENST00000674137.11 | c.375_377dupCTC | p.Ser126dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 20 | ENSP00000501019.6 | ||||
CUL4B | ENST00000681090.1 | c.375_377dupCTC | p.Ser126dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 20 | ENSP00000506288.1 | ||||
CUL4B | ENST00000404115.8 | c.375_377dupCTC | p.Ser126dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 1 of 19 | 1 | ENSP00000384109.4 | |||
CUL4B | ENST00000679927.1 | c.30_32dupCTC | p.Ser11dup | disruptive_inframe_insertion | Exon 2 of 21 | ENSP00000505603.1 | ||||
CUL4B | ENST00000673919.1 | n.375_377dupCTC | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 21 | ENSP00000500994.1 | |||||
CUL4B | ENST00000679432.1 | n.360_362dupCTC | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 22 | ENSP00000505343.1 | |||||
CUL4B | ENST00000681333.1 | n.375_377dupCTC | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 17 | ENSP00000505739.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000540 AC: 6AN: 111014Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.0000600 AC XY: 2AN XY: 33340
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000404 AC: 7AN: 173145Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000325 AC XY: 2AN XY: 61627
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000283 AC: 31AN: 1097143Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000220 AC XY: 8AN XY: 362877
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000540 AC: 6AN: 111014Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.0000600 AC XY: 2AN XY: 33340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
CUL4B-related disorder Uncertain:1
The CUL4B c.429_431dupCTC variant is predicted to result in an in-frame duplication (p.Ser146dup). This variant was reported in an individual with intellectual disability and additional features consistent with CUL4B-related disease (Tzschach et al 2015. PubMed ID: 25649377). This variant is reported in 0.014% of alleles in individuals of East Asian descent in gnomAD, including three hemizygotes. The gnomAD data suggest it is less likely that this is a pathogenic variant. However, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
X-linked intellectual disability Cabezas type Benign:1
- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at