X-137566766-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The ENST00000287538.10(ZIC3):āc.75C>Gā(p.His25Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000202 in 1,188,750 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 7 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000287538.10 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIC3 | NM_003413.4 | c.75C>G | p.His25Gln | missense_variant | 1/3 | ENST00000287538.10 | NP_003404.1 | |
ZIC3 | NM_001330661.1 | c.75C>G | p.His25Gln | missense_variant | 1/3 | NP_001317590.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIC3 | ENST00000287538.10 | c.75C>G | p.His25Gln | missense_variant | 1/3 | 1 | NM_003413.4 | ENSP00000287538 | P1 | |
ZIC3 | ENST00000370606.3 | c.75C>G | p.His25Gln | missense_variant | 1/3 | 5 | ENSP00000359638 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000353 AC: 4AN: 113328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.0000564 AC XY: 2AN XY: 35468
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000366 AC: 5AN: 136788Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000478 AC XY: 2AN XY: 41804
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000186 AC: 20AN: 1075422Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000143 AC XY: 5AN XY: 349770
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000353 AC: 4AN: 113328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.0000564 AC XY: 2AN XY: 35468
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 03, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at