X-137566789-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_003413.4(ZIC3):c.98C>T(p.Ala33Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000628 in 1,179,086 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 26 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A33S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003413.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIC3 | ENST00000287538.10 | c.98C>T | p.Ala33Val | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 3 | 1 | NM_003413.4 | ENSP00000287538.5 | ||
| ZIC3 | ENST00000370606.3 | c.98C>T | p.Ala33Val | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 3 | 5 | ENSP00000359638.3 | |||
| LINC02931 | ENST00000786828.1 | n.130+2285G>A | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000441 AC: 5AN: 113273Hom.: 0 Cov.: 25 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000113 AC: 14AN: 123646 AF XY: 0.000103 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000647 AC: 69AN: 1065759Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000665 AC XY: 23AN XY: 345993 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000441 AC: 5AN: 113327Hom.: 0 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.0000846 AC XY: 3AN XY: 35467 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Heterotaxy, visceral, 1, X-linked Benign:1
- -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at