X-153909156-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_001666.5(ARHGAP4):c.2521A>C(p.Thr841Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000141 in 1,206,675 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 9 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001666.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARHGAP4 | ENST00000350060.10 | c.2521A>C | p.Thr841Pro | missense_variant | Exon 21 of 22 | 1 | NM_001666.5 | ENSP00000203786.8 | ||
ENSG00000284987 | ENST00000646191.1 | n.10A>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 5 | ENSP00000493873.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000178 AC: 2AN: 112349Hom.: 0 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.0000579 AC XY: 2AN XY: 34527
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000574 AC: 1AN: 174083Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 60051
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000137 AC: 15AN: 1094326Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000194 AC XY: 7AN XY: 360060
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000178 AC: 2AN: 112349Hom.: 0 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.0000579 AC XY: 2AN XY: 34527
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.2641A>C (p.T881P) alteration is located in exon 22 (coding exon 22) of the ARHGAP4 gene. This alteration results from a A to C substitution at nucleotide position 2641, causing the threonine (T) at amino acid position 881 to be replaced by a proline (P). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at